Overview

Laptop with screen showing VMRA-SAT Desktop Full Version

Inside the Tool

The video animation below shows the VMRA-SAT desktop software, which is the full version of the tool used by regulatory authorities to undertake a structured self-assessment of their veterinary medicines regulatory systems. 

The VMRA-SAT structure

VMRA-SAT uses a clear and structured assessment hierarchy based on functions, indicators and sub-indicators.


VMRA-SAT uses a clear assessment structure that moves from broad regulatory responsibilities to detailed requirements. It is organised into Functions, Indicators and Sub-indicators, allowing a national regulatory authority to examine both its overall regulatory system and the individual arrangements that support it. This structure helps users identify strengths, recognise gaps and understand where improvement may be needed.

Functions

The eight functions represent the main responsibilities involved in regulating veterinary medicines. They cover the national regulatory system, registration and marketing authorisation, pharmacovigilance, market surveillance and control, licensing of establishments, regulatory inspection, laboratory testing and batch release. Together, they provide a comprehensive view of the veterinary medicines regulatory system.

Indicators

Each Function is divided into indicators. Indicators describe the main elements that should be in place for a regulatory responsibility to operate effectively. These may relate to areas such as legislation, governance, leadership, quality management, human resources, procedures, infrastructure, transparency and monitoring of performance. There are 13 indicators in total, and not all are included in every function.

Sub-indicators

Indicators are assessed through more detailed sub-indicators. Each of the 235 sub-indicators describes a specific requirement or practice that can be examined during the assessment. Users consider whether the requirement has been implemented and record the information and evidence supporting their judgement.

Each sub-indicator is supported by a Fact Sheet containing information such as its purpose, requirements, suggested evidence, references, assessment criteria and relevant limitations or explanatory notes. This guidance helps users interpret the requirements consistently and base their assessment on verifiable information.

Maturity Levels

Every sub-indicator is assigned to one of five maturity levels. These levels provide a pathway showing how a regulatory system can develop from basic operating arrangements towards more advanced and integrated performance.

Pre-bronze represents the minimum operating capability and the essential foundations needed for a regulatory system to function.

Bronze indicates that elements of a regulatory system exist beyond the minimum foundations.

Silver represents an evolving system that is able to perform essential regulatory functions.

Gold represents a stable, well-functioning and integrated regulatory system.

Gold-plus represents an advanced level of regulatory performance and continuous improvement.

The levels are progressive. Requirements assigned to the earlier levels establish the foundations needed to support the more advanced requirements at later levels. They help an authority understand its current position, establish realistic priorities and monitor regulatory improvement over time.

 

vmra-sat-tool-infographic The VMRA-SAT desktop tool can generate reports (in Word or PowerPoint) that bring together the completed self-assessment into a structured view of the authority’s regulatory maturity. These reports show the assessment results across the core regulatory functions, highlight strengths and gaps, and provide a basis for internal review, discussion with function leads and senior management, and prioritisation of improvement actions. Output: report Self-assessment process Once the software and country data file are open, the user works through each regulatory function, indicator and sub-indicator in turn, using the guidance to judge the authority’s current position. For each sub-indicator, they select the appropriate status, such as implemented, partially implemented, not implemented or not applicable, then record the supporting evidence and a short narrative explaining the basis for that judgement. Where gaps are identified, the user adds proposed improvement actions, responsibilities or timelines as part of the Institutional Development Plan. Regulatory maturity feedback Pre Bronze Bronze Silver Gold Gold + Minimum operating capability Elements of regulatory system exist Evolving system that performs essential regulatory functions Stable well- functioning and integrated regulatory system Advanced level of performance Regulatory functions Major regulatory activities an authority is expected to have, each function representing a distinct area of mandate or responsibility (e.g. marketing authorisation). 8 Indicator areas Translating regulatory functions into assessable areas, reflecting essential system elements (legal provisions, governance, procedures, resources and operational practices). 13 235 Sub-indicators The most granular level of assessment in VMRA-SAT, designed to be objectively verifiable through documentation, processes, records or observed practice.

VMRA-SAT framework

The eight regulatory functions in the VMRA-SAT

Click a card to open the relevant fact sheet in a new tab